CTLF Corpus de textes linguistiques fondamentaux • IMPRIMER • RETOUR ÉCRAN
CTLF - Menu général - Textes

Fairbanks, Grant. Experimental Phonetics – T23

An Acoustical Comparison of Vocal Pitch in
Seven- and Eight-year-old Children *1

Grant Fairbanks
University of Illinois

The present paper brings together for inter-comparison the results of
two previously reported acoustical studies of vocal pitch in the speech of
children. In one of these investigations Fairbanks, Wiley, and Lassman (3)
employed two groups of boys at ages seven and eight chronological years.
In the other investigation Fairbanks, Herbert, and Hammond (2) were
concerned with comparable female subjects. While both studies focused
primarily on age comparisons, their design permitted combination of the
data for four-group statistical analysis bearing on sex as well as age differences.
The following summary of the basic investigations is presented as
background.

I. Procedures and Results of Basic Investigations

Each study employed two age groups of 15 subjects each, one at age
seven and one at age eight, selection being otherwise at random. In Table
I are presented means and ranges in age, height, and weight. It is understood

Table I
Group means and ranges for age, height, and weight.
Four groups of 15 subjects each

tableau male | female | age 7 | age 8 | age (mos.) | mean | range | height (ins.) | weight (lbs.)

that the material on height and weight is presented for record only,
and that these variables were not controlled. Age was limited in range as
shown so that the age groups were discrete for each sex. The minimum
difference between the oldest seven-year-old subject and the youngest
eight-year-old subject is seen to be seven months, while the maximum
difference between the oldest and youngest subjects is 15 months.

Experimental procedures were alike in all instances. Each subject was
brought into the laboratory individually, and read aloud a specially constructed
192primary-level test passage of 52 words, which was set up as the
central portion of a longer passage (3). A high-quality disc phonograph
recording was made of each performance. Oscillograms of these samples
were made and subjected to fundamental frequency measurement. Acoustical
data thus secured were tabulated and further measurements were
made following routines previously established (1). For each subject the
data yielded a number of final measurements of various aspects of vocal
pitch which were used in the group computations.

Group means for the 12 pitch measurements treated in this paper are
given in Table II. Thorough discussions of these values have been made

Table II
Group means for pitch measurements. Four groups of 15 subjects
each. Units: pitch level, tones above 16.35 cps;
other pitch values, tones

tableau male | female | age 7 | age 8 | pitch level | no. downward voice breaks | no. upward voice breaks | no. total voice breaks | total pitch range | 90% pitch range | extent downward inflections | extent upward inflections | extent total inflections | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile .

(2, 3) and will not be repeated in detail here. In pitch level the means are
similar to those of adult females and of male children up to age 14, and
are approximately one octave higher than those of mature males. It will be
seen in Table II that voice breaks were found in all groups. These breaks
were comparable in frequency of occurrence, extent, and location to
those of mid-adolescent males, permitting the somewhat revolutionary conclusion
that these phenomena may not be attributed exclusively either to
adolescence or to the male child. In certain standard measures of pitch
variability, commonly considered to be related primarily to oral reading
and speaking ability, the group means, shown in the lower portion of the
193table, were similar to those of older children, and, in many respects to
those of adults.

The differences between the means are impressively small. All apart
from statistical tests of the significance of differences, persons familiar
with the usual experimental values obtained in studies of this type will
immediately recognize the perceptual smallness of the maximum differences.
Thus, for example, the means for pitch level, descriptive of the
central tendencies of the distributions of pitches used, are confined within
a musical extent of 0.5 tone, or one semitone. In the basic studies the
differences between the age groups were not statistically significant 1 2In
both instances the design was a two-group comparison between ages seven
and eight, sex constant, the test of significance being the t. Comparisons
between the sex groups were not made.

Table III
Analysis of variance in pitch measurements. Four groups of
15 subjects each: males age seven, males age eight,
females age seven, females age eight.
Units: pitch level, tones above 16.35 cps; other
pitch values, tones

tableau variance | between groups | within groups | F | pitch level | no. downward voice breaks | no. upward voice breaks | no. total voice breaks | total pitch range | 90% pitch range | extent downward inflections | extent upward inflections | extent total inflections | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile.
df: Between, 3; Within, 56.
F, 3 & 55: 1%, 4.16; 5%, 2.78.194

II. Results

Analysis of Variance

Analysis of Variance. The present study tested the hypothesis that the
four basic experimental groups, representing both sexes at two age levels,
were random samples from the same population with respect to the pitch
characteristics in question. Table III presents the results of simple analysis
of variance, carrying the four groups in parallel. With F required to equal
4.16 or 2.78 at the 1 per cent or 5 per cent levels, respectively, 2 3it will be
seen in the third column of the table that all obtained values fall far
short of significance.

As a further test, “factorial” analysis was performed, employing an age-by-sex
arrangement, with the results shown in Table IV. Age, sex, and
interaction variances are given, and the within groups variances repeated
from Table HI. The F ratios are superfluous, as may be seen by inspection,
but were calculated for record.

In general, neither Table III nor Table IV presents any evidence for rejection
of the null hypothesis. This finding probably is particularly important
with respect to pitch level and number of voice breaks, because of the relationship
of these variables to development of the larynx as a function of
age, and because of the obvious differences between the sexes at later age
levels. It provides, furthermore, a suitable base of departure for the larger
research program which has been planned, and which will consist of
similar studies at successive age levels throughout childhood. Of special
interest in these studies will be the determinations of the age levels at
which significant differences between the sexes first appear, and at which
differences between age levels first appear, sex constant.

Such studies will also increase the confidence with which the data of
the present study may be interpreted. It has been shown here that the
variances between groups are both absolutely and relatively small, and that
all groups resemble mid-adolescent males in many respects. So radically
do such findings depart from tradition that they must be accepted with
great caution. Differences between fact and tradition, however, are hardly
rare phenomena, and it should be pointed out that, within the knowledge
of the author, the present study constitutes the first extensive, objective
investigation of this problem. Nevertheless, two observations are in order:
first, it is possible, although seemingly unlikely, that the four groups were
unrepresentative of the sex and age populations from which they were
randomly drawn; second, it is possible, although seemingly unlikely, that
these seven- and eight-year-old boys and girls were not preadolescents, as
ordinarily conceived.

Comparison of Variances. Sex Groups

Comparison of Variances. Sex Groups. In continuation of the analysis
it was considered that some scrutiny of differences in variance might be
profitable. The intention was not to test the assumption of homogeneity
as such, but rather to examine differences in dispersion for trends related195

Table IV
Analysis of variance in pitch measurements: age, sex, interaction.
Four groups of 15 subjects each: males age seven, males age
eight, females age seven, females age eight. Units:
pitch level, tones above 16.35 cps; other
pitch values, tones

tableau source of variation | age | sex | interaction | within groups | pitch level | no. downward voice breaks | no. upward voice breaks | no. total voice breaks | total pitch range | 90% pitch range | extent downward inflections | extent upward inflections | extent total inflections | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile.
Age, Sex, Interaction, 1; Within Groups, 56.
F = Given Variance / Within Groups Variance; F, 1 & 55: 1%, 7.12; 5%, 4.02.

to sex or age. It is thought that this might be of interest for comparative
purposes in future investigations of other age levels, especially during the
pubescent period.

For this part of the study the two basic groups of males first were combined,
as were the two groups of females, yielding, thus, two sex groups
of 30 subjects each. Table V presents variances and F ratios for these two
combined sex groups. If the variances are compared horizontally it will be196

Table V
Tests of homogeneity of variance in pitch measurements. Male
vs. female. Combined sex groups of 30 subjects each

tableau variance | male | female | F | pitch level | no. downward voice breaks | no. upward voice breaks | no. total voice breaks | total pitch range | 90% pitch range | extent downward inflections | extent upward inflections | extent total inflections | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile.
df: 29.
F, 30 & 29: 2%, 2.41; 10%, 1.85.

seen that they are greater in the male group in 10 of the 12 measures. In
these 10 measures, F exceeds the tabled 2 per cent value in four instances
and the 10 per cent value 3 4in a fifth instance. It will be noted, however,
that three of these five instances occur in extent of pitch shifts, the last
three items of the table.

On the basis of these indications the five significant measures of Table
V were further examined by reverting to the basic groups of 15 subjects
each, and comparing males to females at the two age levels separately. This
procedure yielded the 10 sets of values given in Table VI. Study of this
table shows that the variance was larger in the male group in nine of the
ten comparisons, that the difference in variance was significant beyond the
10 per cent level in six of these nine, and that five of these six significant
differences were at age eight. Again it is observed that three of the six
significant differences occurred in related measures of extent of pitch shifts.
In none of the comparisons of Tables V and VI was the variance significantly
larger in the female. It would appear justifiable, therefore, to record
a slight tendency for variance to be larger in the male, especially at age
eight.197

Table VI
Tests of homogeneity of variance in pitch measurements. Male vs.
female. Basic groups of 15 subjects each. Measures
selected on basis of results of table IV

tableau variance | male | female | F | no. upward voice breaks | total pitch range | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

df: 14.
F, 14 & 14: 2%, 3.70; 10%, 2.48.

Table VII
Tests of homogeneity of variance in pitch measurements.
Age seven vs. age eight. Combined age
groups of 30 subjects each

tableau variance | age 7 | age 8 | F | pitch level | no. downward voice breaks | no. upward voice breaks | no. total voice breaks | total pitch range | 90% pitch range | extent downward inflections | extent upward inflections | extent total inflections | extent downward shifts | extent upward shifts | extent total shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile.
df: 29.
F, 30 & 29: 2%, 2.41; 10%, 1.85.198

Comparison of Variances. Age Groups

Comparison of Variances. Age Groups. As in the preceding section,
the four basic groups were then combined into two age groups of 30 subjects
each, and the same procedures followed. The results are shown in
Table VII. In 10 out of the 12 measures the variance is larger for the
eight-year-old children, and in two of these ten the difference is significant
at the 10 per cent level. In number of downward voice breaks and in
number of total voice breaks the variance is larger at age seven, and the
difference is significant at the 10 per cent level in the former measure. The
three measures in which significant differences were found were singled
out as above for similar comparisons employing the basic groups, with
the results shown in Table VIII. The variance in number of downward
voice breaks, represented by the first two sets of values, is seen to be larger
at age seven in both males and females, the difference between the two
female groups being significant at the 10 per cent level. In the remaining
four comparisons the difference is in the opposite direction in three
instances, and reaches significance at the 10 per cent level once. Except for
the inexplicable reversal in the case of downward voice breaks, the data of
Tables VII and VIII seem to indicate, then, a mild and inconclusive trend
toward larger variance at age eight.

Table VIII
Tests of Homogeneity of Variance in Pitch Measurements. Age
Seven vs. Ace Eight. Basic Groups of 15 Subjects Each.
Measures Selected on Basis of Results of Table VII

tableau variance | age 7 | age 8 | F | no. downward voice breaks | M | 90% pitch range | extent downward shifts

* 95th percentile minus 5th percentile.
df: 14.
F, 14 & 14: 2%, 3.70; 10%, 2,48.

III. Summary

The basic data of two previously reported studies of vocal pitch (2, 3)
were brought together for comparative analysis, the essential purpose being
to investigate relationships to age and sex. Four experimental groups of 15
subjects each were included: male, age seven; male, age eight; female, age
seven; female, age eight. Twelve characteristics of vocal pitch were studied,
with results as follows:199

1. The null hypothesis was found to be tenable for all of the 12 pitch
characteristics. Among these were pitch level and number of voice breaks,
a finding of special interest.

2. Tendencies for variance to be slightly but inconclusively larger in
male children and in eight-year-old children were demonstrated.

References

1. Fairbanks, G. Recent experimental investigations of vocal pitch in
speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1940, 11, 457-466.

2. Fairbanks, G., Herbert, E. L. and Hammond, J. M. An acoustical
study of vocal pitch in seven- and eight-year-old girls. Child Develpm.,
1949, 20, 71-78.

3. Fairbanks, G., Wiley, J. H. and Lassman, F. L. An acoustical study
of vocal pitch in seven- and eight-year-old boys. Child Develpm.,
1949, 20, 63-69.

4. Snedecor, G. W. Statistical Methods. (4th Ed.) Ames: Iowa State
College Press, 1946.

Manuscript received November 3, 1949.200

1* Reprinted from Child Development, Vol. 21, 1950, pp. 121-29.

21 A seemingly unimportant exception occurred in the study of girls (2), in which the
differences between the age groups in extent of upward and total pitch shifts were
found to be significant at the 5 per cent level.

32 df, 3 and 56; working values 3 and 55.

43 Tabled percentages are doubled in this application. Snedecor (4), p. 249.